Comparative analysis of euphemisms in the English and French languages

Introduction

The phenomenon of euphemism—the substitution of an offensive or blunt expression with a mild, indirect, or vague one—serves as a fundamental linguistic "shield" in human communication. While the psychological drive to avoid taboo remains universal, the linguistic mechanisms used to achieve this in English and French reveal profound differences in cultural heritage, social etiquette, and cognitive worldviews. In 2026, as global discourse is increasingly shaped by digital transparency and heightened social sensitivity, a comparative study of euphemisms is more relevant than ever, reflecting how two of the world’s major languages navigate the boundaries of "acceptable" speech.
The relevance of this study stems from the rapid evolution of "New Etiquette" and inclusivity standards. In the English-speaking world, particularly under the influence of North American discourse, euphemization is often driven by political correctness and the professionalization of terminology. Conversely, the French language, while also adapting to modern social pressures, continues to rely heavily on its classical rhetorical traditions, using metaphor and litotes to maintain la politesse and social distance.
The object of this analysis encompasses lexical units and idiomatic expressions used to veil sensitive topics such as death, physical and mental health, socio-economic status, and aging.
The primary objective of this research is to identify the convergence and divergence in euphemistic strategies between the two languages. While English frequently employs Latinate vocabulary or functional jargon to create abstraction (e.g., "collateral damage"), French often utilizes descriptive circumlocution or elegant understatements (e.g., les non-voyants for the blind).
The analysis focuses on several key areas:
Structural Variations: The contrast between English's reliance on technical/academic jargon versus French’s use of literary and abstract tropes.
Cultural Dominants: How English prioritizes "empowerment" and "sensitivity" in its euphemisms, whereas French emphasizes "discretion" and "formality."
The Impact of Globalization: The increasing 2026 trend of anglicismes entering the French lexicon as ready-made euphemisms in corporate and political spheres.
Ultimately, this comparative analysis aims to demonstrate that euphemisms are not merely linguistic decorations but are essential tools that reflect how English and French societies negotiate reality, morality, and the ever-changing landscape of social taboos in the mid-2020s.

References

1. Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Sword. Oxford University Press.
2. Burridge, K. (2012). Euphemism and Dysphemism. В The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford University Press.
3. Linfoot-Ham, K. (2005). The Euphemism Treadmill: Socio-cultural change and semantic shift. Journal of English Linguistics, 33(3), 264-279.
4. Barros, M. A. (2018). The rhetoric of euphemism in political discourse: A critical analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(1), 1-20.
5. Demjén, Z. (2016). Using euphemisms to talk about death on an online forum. Health Communication, 31(7), 849-857.
6. Gomory, T. (2011). The euphemism treadmill in the diagnosis of mental disorders. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 13(4), 263-273.
7. McGlone, M. S. (2011). When euphemism fails: Euphemism, dysphemism, and the search for neutral terms. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(2), 158-175.
8. Renner, T. (2020). Greenwashing through euphemisms: Linguistic strategies in corporate environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 14(4), 488-502.
9. Oxford English Dictionary (OED) Online. (2025/2026). Oxford University Press.
10. Longman Dictionary of English Euphemisms.